New to patent searching? Here’s what you need to know.

Add to DeliciousAdd to DiggAdd to FaceBookAdd to Google BookmarkAdd to RedditAdd to StumbleUponAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Twitter

[tweetmeme source=”Intellogist” only_single=false]

It’s true – I was once new to patent searching, blithely dumping keywords into Google and saying things like  “IPC code? What’s that?”  Ah, youth.   Fortunately, before turning me loose on the unsuspecting public, some extremely patient search experts worked with me on the major concepts of patent information.

And what is the biggest challenge for a new patent searcher?  In my view, it’s understanding the legal concepts behind the organization of patent information. Let me go through just a few of these ideas on a very basic level.  By the way, I am not a lawyer and none of this post constitutes legal advice.

First, patents are legal documents and must be read as such.  Sure, this seems like an obvious point, but trust me, it’s more complicated than it sounds.  During an infringement or validity study, for example, new searchers often stumble because they read patent claims too literally in view of the drawings or the specification, and do not think about the wider, broader implications of the claim language.   See the Infringement and Validity best practices articles on Intellogist to gain a little more understanding of these complex, difficult search types.   And if you don’t come from a legal background, double and triple check your search assumptions with the search requester before proceeding.

As legal documents, patents are only enforceable in the legal system where they are granted.   On a conceptual level, this seems obvious.  On a practical level, this means an information explosion:  the same invention can be described by dozens of different patent applications, each published in a different country (or regional authority).  And don’t think that the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) solves this problem for you – WO/PCTs are simply applications that are on their way to becoming national patents someday (perhaps in dozens of countries).   As far as you’re concerned, those WO (Patent Cooperation Treaty) and EP (European Patent Office) collections, while important, are not substitutes for searching in the national patent collections.

To minimize the complexities of applying for patent protection internationally, many of the major patenting countries of the world signed a treaty known as the Paris Convention.  This agreement introduced the concept of priority, which means that after filing a patent application,  the applicant has 12 months to file in any other Paris Convention country and the original date of filing will be honored.   (Again, I should point out that this is not legal advice.)

To group legally related documents together, the patent information community has adopted the concept of patent families.   Among other things, this convention  make it easy to find out where else the patent applicant may have applied for protection, and to trace the priority.  Patent families are a fluid concept; there are many different ways to define them. If you think you know what a patent family  represents, let me ask you this follow-up question: do you understand the difference between an INPADOC and a Derwent patent family?  If you answered no, I strongly recommend reading up on this topic – we have put together an introduction to the topic on our Patent Families glossary page.

All of these legal concepts affect the way patent information is organized, both within the structure of a patent document (specification vs. claims), and in its relationship with other documents.   These concepts affect the way we search patent information on a very practical level.

To take patent families as an example, if you needed to search a patenting authority for which English-language records were not available, one quick (and incomplete) way to do so would be to run a keyword search in the English-language authorities, and limit the results to only those which contain a family member from the country of interest.  This method would not capture any documents without English-language family members, and of course, a native-language searcher would be needed to perform a comprehensive search.  However, it might give you a quick idea of what you can expect to find in the non-English collection.   Sneaky strategies like these can allow us to use the relationships between patent documents to our advantage.

Since I can’t be comprehensive in this blog post, feel free to expand on the legal concepts that affect how we search patent information in the comments section!

Like This!

Thomson Innovation

This post was contributed by Intellogist Team member Kristin Whitman.

3 Responses

  1. Kristin is absolutely right – there’s much more to patent searching than finding patents with the right keywords. Very few new patent searchers have mentors to help them learn how to find the right references and apply the right legal principles to a search, so the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association Patent Information Committee created a short course to put all of the considerations into context. Over 400 people took that course when it was given by the Pharmaceutical Research and Education Institute (PERI) between 1989 and 2008, but in 2009 and 2010 there weren’t enough registrants to cover PERI’s budget, and the course was transferred to the Patent Information Users Group (PIUG).

    PIUG has scheduled the course for October 14-15, 2010, in New Brunswick, NJ. Anyone interested in learning “Patent Information Fundamentals,” is invited to register. More information is available on the PIUG website, http://www.piug.org.

  2. Before searching for patents, understand the requirements. One has to understand the background technology, before selecting the keywords.The right combination of keywords and patent classifciation is derived after 3 or 4 iterations of searching. The searching of patents is time consuming and based on the client’s requrement such as state-of-art or patentability or Invalidity or freedom to operate searches.

  3. […] footing with the traditional intellectual property powers. Provided the searchers keep in mind what all new patent searchers should know, being able to identify inventions and use the rich technical information available within patents […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: