• Welcome!

    Intellogist is THE place to find patent searching expertise. Join our community today to see what all the buzz is about!
  • Our Owner

    Landon IP is a global provider of patent search, analysis, information, and translation services.
  • Recommended

    Patent search experts from Landon IP have compiled their expertise into a book! Check out:

    Patent Searching:Tools & Techniques
    Patent Searching:Tools & Techniques, edited by David Hunt, Long Nguyen, and Matt Rodgers

    Stephen Adams delivers a very comprehensive text on patent information sources:

    Information Sources in Patents
    Information Sources in Patents, 2nd ed. by Stephen R. Adams

    Robert Cantrell delves into the business side of the patent world: Outpacing the Competition: Patent-Based Business Strategy
    Outpacing the Competition: Patent-Based Business Strategy

    Alexander Poltorak and Paul Lerner give you a leg up on intellectual property licensing… Essentials of Licensing Intellectual Property
    Essentials of Licensing Intellectual Property

    …and patents specifically Essentials of Patents
    Essentials of Patents
  • Advertisements

Patently Overused

[tweetmeme source=”Intellogist” only_single=false]

Aren’t we a little tired of all the patent puns these days? It could be that I’m chronically hyper-exposed to this kind of thing, but there are a lot of Patently (blank) and Patent (blanks) phrases and puns going around. With the exception of the great patent law blog Patently-O, I’m a little bored by it all, frankly. Not to be too Andy Rooney about it (heck, I used it ironically in my title of this post), I just think we could be doing better.

Crazy inventions or nonsense ideas are dubbed “patently absurd,” “patently crazy,” “patently insane,” or some variation. There are numerous websites espousing goofy patents using this terminology including “Totally Absurd Inventions”, “Patently Silly” and “Patently Absurd!”. The mainstream media loves to say things are “patently absurd” when discussing patent related topics–just see Wired, Forbes, or The New York Times for proof. Each new article’s author is falling over the previous author to be more clever than the last (warning: explicit language from Penny Arcade).

“Patently stupid” means not only is something dumb, it’s all-time put-it-in-the-books dumb. Patently stupid can be used to rail against the patent system itself or just as another rock to be loaded into the slingshot of the trite.

Someone crying “patently false” means that they believe something in incredibly untrue. President Obama has given this one a go, but it’s no stranger to the Republicans or even the Catholic Church.

What’s your favorite “patent(ly) (blank)” phrase? Give us your best examples below. Just remember kids, it’s all pun and games until someone loses an eye.

Patent Resources Group

This post was contributed by Intellogist team member Chris Jagalla.


2 Responses

  1. Check the historical meaning of “patent” — it means open as in “letters patent” being open letters granting a right. So, patently stupid means openly stupid. “Patent” now is also used to mean letters patent. Mixing the two meanings is great fun only so long as one knows what one is doing.

    • I think it says something about the imagination of writers (on a deadline, no doubt) that they all come up with the same phrases, don’t you think? This was just a lighthearted poke.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: