After the jump, learn about the unique features of Sobotong that allow the user to identify prior art in multiple languages and formats, and find out the down side of using a multi-lingual search platform!
Use
The Sobotong homepage appears to indicate that the search and translation functions for the system are powered by Bing and Google. On the Sobotong homepage, users can enter a search term (in English) and select from two drop-down menus which languages to search in. The user can select from 64 available languages. In the screenshot below, the two selected languages are English and Japanese.

From the Sobotong homepage, enter a search term and select two languages to simultaneously search in.
Search results will display in English, with the search term translated into the two other selected languages displayed above the English search results. The user can select the translated terms to view search results in the selected language. If the user has searched for a term in English and selected two non-English languages, then results will initially appear in English. However, if the user selects one of the non-English equivalent search terms, then the non-English search term will be automatically entered in the search form. The user will then be unable to return to the English search results unless they re-do the search.
It is therefore recommended that users choose one of the two languages to search in simultaneously as English, so that they can always select to return to the English-language search results through the English search term link.
In the left side menu, the user can select to view a variety of search result types:
- Web – Some result listings include thumbnail images. Individual result listings include a site title, an excerpt, and a URL.
- Image – Only a thumbnail image is displayed in the result listings.
- News – An icon indicating the news source, article title, URL, and excerpt are included in the result listings.
- Music – The site title, URL, and excerpt are included in the result listings. An option to filter results by website is included by each search result.
- Video – A video title and thumbnail image are included for each search result.
- Movie – The site title, URL, and excerpt are included in the result listings. An option to filter results by website is included by each search result.
- RSS – The site title, URL, and excerpt are included in the result listings. An option to filter results by website is included by each search result.
- Document – The site title, URL, and excerpt are included in the result listings. An option to filter results by website is included by each search result. Users can also choose to filter results by document format (.pdf, .doc, .ppt, .rtf, .txt, .xls).
- Software – The site title, URL, and excerpt are included in the result listings. An option to filter results by website is included by each search result.
- Google – The search term is transfered directly into the Google search form.
Within the result listings, the search term is bolded in the result title, URL, and excerpts. The user can scroll to the bottom of the page to navigate to the next page of search results. Selecting a search result will open the link in a new tab.
On the right side of each result page, a list of related search terms is displayed (only for some terms, mostly in English). The user can select a related search term to automatically enter that term in the search form.
The Good:
- Search terms are automatically translated and searched in up to two languages, so the user can enter their original search term in English.
- Related search terms are suggested for some search terms.
- Multiple result types are available, and the user can view each result type for each set of language results.
- The user can filter document results by format type.
The Bad:
- Google ads are displayed at the bottom the the search page.
- No “help” section is available to give users tips on utilizng Boolean/truncation operators and correct search syntax.
- It is unclear whether the search/translation functions are powered by Bing or Google.
- Few non-English results seem to be available under certain result types (News, Music, Movie, RSS, Document, Software) during some test searches (for terms like “centrifuge” and “iron”).
- Machine translation is used to translate search terms, and as previous blog posts have discussed, machine translation is not as accurate as human translation.
Conclusion
A professional patent searcher who can fluently search in multiple languages will always produce more accurate and thorough prior art results then a machine-translated multilingual search system. Sobotong still provides a useful interface for English-language searchers who want to conduct an initial search for non-English prior art, and the system has the added bonus of allowing the user to search through multiple document formats simultaneously. Using Sobotong for a multilingual search will certainly be quicker than searching Google in English, translating the term using Google Translate, and searching again in the new language. Sobotong provides no help literature, though, so the user is on their own when figuring out how to correctly format queries.
Do you know of any other search systems that let the user search in multiple languages simultaneously? Let us know in the comments!
This post was contributed by Joelle Mornini. The Intellogist blog is provided for free by Intellogist’s parent company Landon IP, a major provider of patent searches, trademark searches, technical translations, and information retrieval services.
Filed under: Items of Interest, Search Tips and Tricks Tagged: | Bing, Google, machine translation, non-patent literature, NPL









A search service similar to Sobotong is 2lingual.com (http://www.2lingual.com/). What I like more is that the results are displayed in two columns which allows a quick overview of the results in both languages. While the default for 2lingual is Google seach, it distinguishes between a Google and Bing search under different URL’s:
http://www.2lingual.com/2lingual-google/
http://www.2lingual.com/2lingual-bing-search/
and they seem to also offer a Google and Twitter multilingual voice-search – though I didn’t try it.
Even better – in my view – is WorldWideScience.org (http://worldwidescience.org/), a federated search engine that searches a large (deep-web) collection of scientific and technical information from more than 70 countries around the world (there is a visual world-map that allows to locate the resources per country – alternatively you can have a look at the advanced search). You indicate your search language and the search term(s) are automatically translated (Microsoft Translator) in other languages to retrieve possible results. Again its machine translation with all its drawbacks… but it also opens new (non-english) resources for you, so potentially giving scientists a more global view on research in other countries.
Thanks for the suggestion, I’ll definitely look in to writing a future post on this!
[...] Sobotong: Search for Non-Patent Literature in Multiple Languages and Formats Simultaneously (The Intellogist Blog) [...]
I think the admin of this site is genuinely working hard in support of his website, because here every information is quality based data.